On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 09:16 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:57:16AM +0000, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 14:22 +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure where to go from here. A deadlock doesn't seem likely, but > > > it's possible that background fsck could lock up the system for quite > > > some time by using this sysctl. How long did you wait before dropping to > > > ddb (approximately)? > > > > Not sure, probably my problem is related or same (I have posted the > > message to current_at_ before): > > > > -- > > About 3-5 time per day recent current lockup on my notebook. > > > > Symptoms: > > system responsive, not locked processes works, I can switch X to sc0 > > and back. > > > > processes locked on 'sysctl lock' (see below) > > allways there is one process sleeping on allproc > > > > usually it is related with high activity (this case evolution gets bunch > > of night mail and pass it through spam-assassin) > > Could you possibly do "show locks" from the DDB prompt? This is > essential as it will tell us where something is holding the sysctl > lock hostage. Do not see this problem for about month. It it will appear again I will provide show locks. -- Vladimir B. Grebenchikov vova_at_fbsd.ruReceived on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 12:15:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC