Chris Stenton wrote: > Any reason why the default value for HZ is still set at 100? Sure. Timer interrupts and context switching aren't free, you know: the faster the HZ, the more time the system spends on overhead rather than doing useful work. > Would not 1000 be better for finer granularity? Certainly it would, but tradeoffs exist.... -- -ChuckReceived on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 14:23:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC