Re: ethercons updated for -CURRENT

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:49:31 +0930
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:40, Danny Braniss wrote:
> The upshot off all this is, if the SOL works, then we can kiss KVM away,
> and as Robert said, just power and ethernet and you are set.

You could probably use fwcons (I've only used it a little to test) but I think 
once it's enabled the target doesn't have to be cooperative for it to work 
(although then you need to run firewire to your boxes as well as ethernet)

- -- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA77Sj5ZPcIHs/zowRAhcIAJ9Pb0TN5nYQ2zNKkyhRvt2KH7Eu5wCeO8Ce
o52viKpLb2tqO/EGppgoonc=
=sCDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sat Jul 10 2004 - 07:20:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC