Re: ethercons updated for -CURRENT

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:42:23 +0930
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:29, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > You could probably use fwcons (I've only used it a little to test) but I
> > think once it's enabled the target doesn't have to be cooperative for it
> > to work (although then you need to run firewire to your boxes as well as
> > ethernet)
>
> serial/firewire are ok for one computer, but when you have several, then
> this does not scale (imaging a cabinet with 30 1U boxes :-).

Weell..
You can get Firewire hubs. Not sure how much routing the do.
(ie if they are like ethernet switches or hubs)

They're a bit more expensive than ethernet tho :)

> appart from that, ethernet (once you overcome some basic security issues)
> is great to get the console.

Yeah.

- -- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFA78EI5ZPcIHs/zowRAsYlAJ9b6cndOPaLWXufnTDSrxf7jQtaoQCgmAy9
R8DZm29Uoe39XjPN9I30N/8=
=/+tg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sat Jul 10 2004 - 08:12:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC