> Is testing a nfs-server with current as of July 9'th. > While copying to and from the server to two different > hosts, I noticed that copying _to_ the server was > twice as fast as copying _from_ the server. This was > regardless of which host I tested from. > > Is using tcp, r/w-size 65536 on client, server: > > net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 65536 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 65536 > > All hosts are on 100 Mbit/s. > > It takes 5 min. 30 sec. copying 3 GB to, 11 min. 43 > sec. from the nfs-server. Is there a penalty reading > from the server in relation to nfs? I've done some nfs "benchmarking", but not (yet) with two clients and one server. (Mainly) because I'm still looking for a comparable third system. Results of that are on: http://withagen.dyndns.org/FreeBSD/notes/NFS-performance It's nothing really scientific, but it shows some trends... And yours is certainly not one I have seen. --WjWReceived on Sat Jul 10 2004 - 08:32:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC