On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > there had been some discussion lately about if_sk and attach locking. > > compiled if_sk as module on amd64 and kldloading started a race with > > follwoing output: > > If you have unpatched sk sources, the locking is entirely wrong. You > _will_ get witness warnings. I have a basic patch that gets rid of most with my attach patch not yet, but I had seen those with my old kernel including a LOR. > of them, and I think bms is working on a more complete lockdown. I posted > my patch to -current, but I can't guarantee its entirely correct :) I had thought it got comitted already. Will import it into my local tree then. Thanks. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeTReceived on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 04:00:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC