On 12-Jul-2004 Robert Watson wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, John Polstra wrote: > >> No, it needs to be fixed. It's printing a totally incorrect error >> message, and nobody should have to use dmesg to find out what's really >> happened. > > Well, the problem here is that the errno error-reporting mechanism can > report but not describe errors. We could add a new EKLDLINKER to point at > a linker error (or the like), or a whole set of new errnos, but the > mechanism even then couldn't report which symbols are missing, etc. One > or more linker-specific error values would probably be a useful start. I fully understand the implementation difficulties, but we have to be careful to observe the distinction between correct behavior and easy-to-implement behavior. The kldload(2) API doesn't support correct behavior, so that's where the focus needs to be -- not on making users feel stupid for failing to look in the dmesg output. JohnReceived on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 18:55:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC