Re: 5.3-RELEASE TODO

From: Mayo <mayo_at_mayo.sk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:34:18 -0700
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 21:19, Jon Noack wrote:
> On 07/15/04 09:24, Robert Watson wrote:
> > Desired features for 5.3-RELEASE
> > 
> >  +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >  |      Issue      |   Status    |  Responsible   |      Description      |
> >  |-----------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------|
> >  |                 |             |                | A process cannot be   |
> >  |                 |             |                | interrupted while     |
> >  |                 |             |                | waiting on a lock.    |
> >  | rpc.lockd(8)    |             |                | Fixing this requires  |
> >  | stability       | --          | --             | that the RPC code be  |
> >  |                 |             |                | taught how to deal    |
> >  |                 |             |                | with lock             |
> >  |                 |             |                | cancellation and      |
> >  |                 |             |                | interruption events.  |
> >  +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> Interesting note on this:
> I have my home directory NFS mounted from another -CURRENT box.  If I 
> enable NFS locking and am running a ULE kernel on the client, I am 
> unable to log into KDE.  It accepts my password but hangs before the 
> splash/loading screen appears.  I can switch to a console and login 
> there without issues, so NFS isn't completely dead.  Strangely, using a 
> 4BSD kernel works fine.  This is repeatable on my box (at least it 
> happened the 2 times I tried each kernel so far).
> 
> Hmm, it appears that rpc.lockd died on the server end (at some point, 
> anyway).  I have a .core but it doesn't appear like it's finding any 
> debug symbols.  I build everything with -g, so I don't know why it 
> can't.  I'll keep the core around in case anyone cares.  Sounds like the 
> problems may already be known, so if it's not useful please let me know.
> 
> Jon
> 
> $ gdb /usr/sbin/rpc.lockd rpc.lockd.core
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain 
> conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols 
> found)...
> Core was generated by `rpc.lockd'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.2...(no debugging symbols 
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.2
> Reading symbols from /lib/libutil.so.4...(no debugging symbols 
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libutil.so.4
> Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.5
> Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols 
> found)...done.
> Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> #0  0x0804ca84 in ?? ()
> (gdb)

I have a core file as well, I get rpc.lockd crashes occasionaly when I
use Evolution extensively or do lots of file operations (nfs mounted
home directories)

I get pretty much the same output as the one listed above, with the
exception that I have nss_ldap so there is few of those libraries
mentioned, but it can't find any debugging symbols.

mayo

> ________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

Received on Fri Jul 16 2004 - 02:34:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:01 UTC