On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:37:28AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > What are the differences? > * Portability: gtar is portable to many different Unix and non-Unix > systems. bsdtar supports standard file formats that are widely > supported by other implementations. There are efforts to port > bsdtar to other platforms. * Less known bugginess: gtar on sparc64 has sporadic problems, e.g. attempting to use all available VM. bsdtar doesn't have obvious problems on other FreeBSD architectures. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC