Hi, is there available a working patch for current "sk" driver? Thanks a lot. Tomas Randa On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 00:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > there had been some discussion lately about if_sk and attach locking. > compiled if_sk as module on amd64 and kldloading started a race with > follwoing output: > > --- very short part of console log --- > [some hundred more of the following lines] > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > malloc(M_WAITOK) of "64", forcing M_NOWAIT with the following non-sleepable locks held: > exclusive sleep mutex skc0 (network driver) r = 0 (0xffffff003000b670) locked _at_ /u1/src/HEAD/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c:1335 > Stack backtrace: > witness_warn() at witness_warn+0x1a7 > uma_zalloc_arg() at uma_zalloc_arg+0x4c > malloc() at malloc+0x9f > scope6_ifattach() at scope6_ifattach+0x20 > in6_domifattach() at in6_domifattach+0x91 > if_attachdomain1() at if_attachdomain1+0xb9 > if_attach() at if_attach+0x465 > ether_ifattach() at ether_ifattach+0x27 > sk_attach() at sk_attach+0x334 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > (null)() at 0 > [some hundred more of these lines] > --- end --- > > > > I solved this problem without further investigation of possible > bad impacts with this patch: > > > Index: if_sk.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /u2/src/CVS/prefixes/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c,v > retrieving revision 1.83 > diff -u -p -r1.83 if_sk.c > --- if_sk.c 28 Jun 2004 20:07:03 -0000 1.83 > +++ if_sk.c 10 Jul 2004 21:44:53 -0000 > _at__at_ -1332,7 +1332,9 _at__at_ sk_attach(dev) > error = 0; > sc_if = device_get_softc(dev); > sc = device_get_softc(device_get_parent(dev)); > +#if 0 > SK_LOCK(sc); > +#endif > port = *(int *)device_get_ivars(dev); > free(device_get_ivars(dev), M_DEVBUF); > device_set_ivars(dev, NULL); > _at__at_ -1472,7 +1474,9 _at__at_ sk_attach(dev) > } > > fail: > +#if 0 > SK_UNLOCK(sc); > +#endif > if (error) { > /* Access should be ok even though lock has been dropped */ > sc->sk_if[port] = NULL; > --- end --- > > > can someone with some more knowledge about this driver and > general locking of if_* please review this. TIA. -- Tomas Randa <lists_at_hosting50.cz> -- Tomas Randa <lists_at_hosting50.cz>Received on Tue Jul 20 2004 - 07:46:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:02 UTC