Re: crfree/crhold mutex

From: Robert Watson <rwatson_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:40:02 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:

> It's held for such small times.. shouldn't it be a spinlock? 

With the recent change to use adaptive mutexes by default, it should
effectively be a spin mutex on SMP.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert_at_fledge.watson.org      Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research

Received on Fri Jul 23 2004 - 22:40:50 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Conrad J. Sabatier: "Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion"
Previous message: michael johnson: "Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion"
In reply to: Julian Elischer: "crfree/crhold mutex"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC