The lock-order reversal that precedes this panic makes little sense: lock order reversal 1st 0xffffff007fed7c10 PV ENTRY (UMA zone) _at_ /home2/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:2033 2nd 0xffffffff8063dce0 UMA pcpu (UMA pcpu) _at_ /home2/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:2015 This corresponds to: void uma_zfree_arg(uma_zone_t zone, void *item, void *udata) { ... zfree_restart: cpu = PCPU_GET(cpuid); CPU_LOCK(cpu); *** 2nd *** cache = &zone->uz_cpu[cpu]; zfree_start: bucket = cache->uc_freebucket; if (bucket) { /* * Do we have room in our bucket? It is OK for this uz count * check to be slightly out of sync. */ if (bucket->ub_cnt < bucket->ub_entries) { KASSERT(bucket->ub_bucket[bucket->ub_cnt] == NULL, ("uma_zfree: Freeing to non free bucket index.")); bucket->ub_bucket[bucket->ub_cnt] = item; bucket->ub_cnt++; #ifdef INVARIANTS ZONE_LOCK(zone); *** 1st *** if (keg->uk_flags & UMA_ZONE_MALLOC) uma_dbg_free(zone, udata, item); else uma_dbg_free(zone, NULL, item); ZONE_UNLOCK(zone); #endif CPU_UNLOCK(cpu); return; So, whereas Giant isn't held and it should be, the pv zone lock is held and it shouldn't be. Even with preemption, it's hard to see how we would wind up in namei() with the pv zone lock still held. AlanReceived on Wed Jul 28 2004 - 01:53:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC