On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 20:51, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Yep, and if it had been sent to freebsd-announce, many more people would > > have read about it. current_at_ and doc_at_ is insufficient. > > When I said "here", I didn't realise what lists I was posting to - it had been > announced on ports (and since then mentioned there many times). OK. ports_at_ is also insufficient. To expect all users of the ports tree to track ports_at_ is unreasonable. A post to announce_at_ is still justified. IMHO. -- Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/Received on Wed Jul 28 2004 - 17:14:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC