Hi! On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:45:22AM +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > There is a trivial patch for one .info file which adds all the > > FreeBSD-specific options to gcc.1. > > Which I assume haven't changed a bit since Oct 2003? You (FreeBSD gcc maintainer) said that you are not interested in this patch. I did not update it since that time. > > There is a trivial patch for bmake glue that installs gcc.1 from > > gcc distribution (src/contrib/gcc/doc/gcc.1) > > instead of gcc 2.95.x manual (src/contrib/gcc/gcc.1) > > that is currently being installed. > > > > Both exist since Oct 2003. > > In their worthless state, yes. Hint: cvs log on contrib/gcc/gcc.1. > As I said, I am perfectly fine with someone taking over gcc man page > maintenance. > This will have to be done outside of GCC tree in contrib though. ^^^^ This is the first constructive reply from you since several people approached me asking why gcc.1 in 5.x is man page for 2.95.x. I will take this route. No problems! > The task is not as trivial as some might mistakenly believe. > > This is the last message on this subject I am willing to write. I never thought that maintaining gcc is trivial. I worked with previous gcc maintainers in the past. I HIGHLY appreciate your commitment. But I do not think that it is acceptable to pretend that the problem does not exist or to bash every attempt to make things better. /fjoeReceived on Fri Jul 30 2004 - 07:02:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC