On Monday 07 June 2004 20:42, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > Actually its a bit better than that. It works for most use > > > > cases right now on i386 but would get confused on dlclose. I'll > > > > fix that before I move it into current. > > > > > > Does it work on static bound executables? > > > > Which one is static bound > > The executable; you know, no rtld. What I call complete executable to > distinguish it from static TLS on my page. Does static TLS work? > > See also: http://wiki.daemon.li/index.pl?ThreadLocalStorage No, this one is not yet supported. I think I can deal with this inside libc with some small support from the kernel (probably just to provide details of the TLS segment size etc.)Received on Mon Jun 07 2004 - 19:42:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:56 UTC