On Fri, 2004-Jun-04 11:35:14 -0600, P.D. Seniura wrote: >>From my CTM log for June 2: > >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:234:> DM /ports/print/teTeX-base >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:235:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/Makefile >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:236:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/distinfo >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:237:> DM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:238:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files/listings.sty >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:239:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files/pkg-install.in >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:240:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/pkg-descr >./20040602/ctm_ports.log:241:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/pkg-plist > > >I just can't find the cvs commit entry on cvs-ports_at_ >to see what's going on. And Nothing Much Relevent on >ports_at_. Whilst this is most likely a repo-copy, tagging operations also generate CVSup or CTM traffic (though FN rather than FM records) without any commit messages. (Hence the large and very slow to apply CTM delta files that appear leading up to releases). If you're really concerned about the change, you can always gunzip the delta and study it with more(1) or less(1). -- Peter JeremyReceived on Tue Jun 08 2004 - 06:08:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:56 UTC