On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 12:24:29AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:36:58AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 04:07:13PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote: > > > On 06/13/04 13:13, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > >On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote: > > > >>I just tested this on my SMP all-in-one home server (Web, Mail, > ... > > Bump HZ. If you were using the 64-bit PCI I'd say bump it > > to 5000, but since you're using 32-bit PCI, bumping it that > > high just doesn't make sense, so raise it up to 2000-3000. > > > > Set kern.polling.idle_poll=1. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > this is the part that cannot possibly work with SMP, > and that seems to have problem with current even on !SMP > What, idle priority kthreads does work correctly? (My real experience with polling(4) is under -STABLE.) Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC