In the last episode (Jun 14), Garance A Drosehn said: > At 10:00 AM +0200 6/14/04, Brad Knowles wrote: > >At 6:41 PM -0400 2004-06-13, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > >> So, maybe something like "log.t2004f14a" instead of "log.0". I > >> could obviously spell out the time more, but that would be an even > >> longer suffix... > > > > Could this be a configuration option? For maximum > >compression, maybe base64 the ctime, but for maximum readability use > >YYYY-MM-DD? > > Several people have mentioned alternate formats that they would like > to see, so I plan to have some flexibility in the format. Since I > have not implemented it yet, I cannot say just how flexible it might > be... :-) strftime! -- Dan Nelson dnelson_at_allantgroup.comReceived on Mon Jun 14 2004 - 16:46:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC