Hi, I will try that. Would it be better to use 4.10 and MySQL w. LinuxThreads instead? It's production databases that we run on the machine so stability is a must (yes I know - 5.2 isn't stable yet...) The reason why we decided to use 5.2-CURRENT was that the improved SMP support - which seems to still have some bugs? Regards -- Lasse Laursen · VP, Hosting Technology · NetGroup Processing Aps St. Kongensgade 40H · DK-1264 Copenhagen K, Denmark Phone: +45 3370 1526 · Fax: +45 3313 0066 - Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations - BSD is the One True Code ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen_at_vigrid.com> To: "Lasse Laursen" <laursen_at_netgroup.dk> Cc: <freebsd-threads_at_freebsd.org>; <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:10 PM Subject: Re: Possible Threading problem with -CURRENT / MySQL? > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Lasse Laursen wrote: > > > > > WE use the SCHED_ULE, and: > > > > > > > > # Memory options > > > > options MAXDSIZ="(1536*1024*1024)" > > > > options MAXSSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" > > > > options DFLDSIZ="(1536*1024*1024)" > > > > > > Try using SCHED_4BSD, then try removing all memory options. > > > > Wouldn't this limit us to 512 MB of memory per process running on the > > server? we tried with each scheduler with same results. I will try to > > recompile without the memory options and use the old scheduler. Any hints > > why this might work? > > No, just trying to see what happens with a more stock > kernel. Also, try removing /etc/my.conf to use default > MySQL settings. > > -- > Dan > >Received on Mon Jun 14 2004 - 17:14:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC