Good sleuthing job. You have correctly analyzed the problem and your fix is correct. You have my blessing to check it in. And thanks for taking the time to figure this out when I did not have the time to do so. Kirk McKusick =-=-=-=-=-= Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:38:18 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama_at_imgsrc.co.jp> To: Frode Nordahl <frode_at_nordahl.net> Cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick_at_mckusick.com>, freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS snapshot deadlocks X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match At Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:06:55 +0000 (UTC), Frode Nordahl wrote: > tty1: > while (1) > ls -la /usr/.snap > end > > tty2: > dump -0af /some/where -C 32 -L /dev/ad0s1f I did diagnose about this. L1. ls(1) issues lstat(2) during walking inside directory. L2. lstat(2) calls namei(). L3. namei() tries to lock VREG /usr/.snap/dump_snapshot after locking VDIR /usr/.snap. D1. dump(8) calls mount(2) via mksnap_ffs(8). D2. mount(2) calls ffs_snapshot(). D3. ffs_snapshot() locks /usr/.snap/dump_snapshot after VOP_CREATE(). D4. ffs_snapshot() searches active but unlinked files from mnt_nvnodelist. D5. when it founds /usr/.snap vnode, tries to lock it. My question is: 1. should ordering of such locks be parent dir vnode first, and file in that dir vnode second? 2. is comparing vnode pointer like this to skip /usr/.snap safe? Index: ffs_snapshot.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c,v retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.81 ffs_snapshot.c --- ffs_snapshot.c 16 Jun 2004 00:26:30 -0000 1.81 +++ ffs_snapshot.c 16 Jun 2004 03:34:44 -0000 _at__at_ -424,6 +424,11 _at__at_ MNT_ILOCK(mp); continue; } + if (xvp == nd.ni_dvp) { + VI_UNLOCK(xvp); + MNT_ILOCK(mp); + continue; + } if (vn_lock(xvp, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_INTERLOCK, td) != 0) { MNT_ILOCK(mp); goto loop; I did repeated test like as Frode did, but I cannot see any deadlocks after this patch. -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama_at_imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. <kuriyama_at_FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD ProjectReceived on Wed Jun 16 2004 - 02:34:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC