At 4:14 AM +0200 6/20/04, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > >is it normal that the selected process is the last forked thread >and not the thread owner (father) ? I committed the changes, so people can try this if they want. Example: (48) ps -HO lwp,nlwp PID LWP NLWP TT STAT TIME COMMAND 1870 1870 1 ?? SL 0:00.13 sshd: gad_at_ttyp3 (sshd) 1871 1871 1 p3 SLs 0:00.09 -bash (bash) 2535 100002 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread 2535 100001 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread 2535 100004 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread 2535 2535 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread 2535 100000 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread 2535 100003 6 p3 SL+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread (49) ps -O lwp,nlwp PID LWP NLWP TT STAT TIME COMMAND 1870 1870 1 ?? S 0:00.13 sshd: gad_at_ttyp3 (sshd) 1871 1871 1 p3 Ss 0:00.09 -bash (bash) 2535 100004 6 p3 S+ 0:00.00 ./cyr-thread When the -H is not requested, why does process 2535 show up as thread-ID #100004 instead of #2535? Is that something that we need to change when copying info into kproc_info ? Or is that perfectly reasonable? I have not worked with threaded apps, so I am not sure what people would be expecting here. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad_at_gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad_at_freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih_at_rpi.eduReceived on Sun Jun 20 2004 - 21:55:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC