Doug White schrieb: >On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Hilko Meyer wrote: > >> Doug White schrieb: >> >I haven't had time to look at this. >> > >> >Can y ou try it with -CURRENT, if you ahve't already? >> >> I can, but I don't want to do that. And it's no longer necessary. I've >> installed the recent update of the samba 2.2.8 port this evening and >> discovered the reason of the panic at the time. > >I was able to reproduce this with -current, but looking at the code I >don't understand how that vfs op is getting nulled out. It should be set >to the default operation which just return EOPNOTSUPP. I guess some >KASSERTs are in order. > >The function itself hasn't changed materially in months, so its hard to >tell when this crept in. Out of curiousity, do you have a -stable box >around, and can you reproduce on that? I've tried todays -current and can't reproduce the panic anymore. I think that the commit in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-April/061569.html from pjd_at_ fixed my problem. thanks, HilkoReceived on Sun Jun 20 2004 - 20:38:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC