Re: startup error for pflogd

From: Martin P. Hellwig <mhellwig_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:32:25 +0200
Michael Reifenberger wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Max Laier wrote:
> ...
>
>> I'll try to explain the reasoning behind this. If there are a zillion
>> processes all owned by nobody:nogroup and an attacker manages to obtain
>> control over one of them, the rest might be easy/easier prey. The 
>> evildoer
>> will have better chances to obtain critical resources and maybe root 
>> in the
>> end.
>>
>> This might seem like OpenBSD/paranoia, but my opinion on it is: It's 
>> done so
>> why not port it over? It also helps to keep the diff down (which 
>> means less
>> work).
>>
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to add all _<service> users at once then?
>
Yes voter for this one , from my limited user perspective  this seems 
the logical thing to do.

-- 
mph

$ /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bikeshed.sh
$ Usage, mix UNIX with: {politics|religion|both(=GNU/Linux)}
Received on Mon Jun 21 2004 - 14:32:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC