On Monday 21 June 2004 18:46, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:39:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > This might seem like OpenBSD/paranoia, but my opinion on it is: It's done > > so why not port it over? It also helps to keep the diff down (which means > > less work). > > > > If there is no resistance against "yet another user", I will add _pflogd. > > I would prefer just 'pflogd' until it is discussed if we want to follow > the _<service> way. Okay, let's talk about this then: Any strong optionions one way or the other? I think this is a bikeshed. There is no technical argument (to my knowledge) that suggests either. My vote is for "_<service>" to keep the diff down, but that is not an argument of course. Others have said that it: - helps to recognize system processes - helps to see "bad things" happening (1000 _pflogd is not a good sign) - resolves possible namespace problems I can't think of a propper contra, but maybe "It looks ugly" qualifies ;) Tell me if I overlook something. Thanks. -- Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC