Andrea Campi wrote: > in the process of setting up a nanobsd-based system I've stumbled on so > many issues during a make buildworld that I've started wondering whether > NO_YP_LIBC is meant to work. Is anybody using it, and do you need local > changes? Currently it's broken. Try this patch: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/10039-no-yp-libc.diff > Another question is what should it actually do. Parts of librpcsvc and > libwrap call yp_*, as do libexec/{mknetid,ypxfr); it doesn't make sense > to not compile YP support in libc but try (and fail) to compile these. > Maybe we should have a single variable (NOYP or NO_YP, I don't care) > that turns off all YP-only code. This is exactly what the patch does (or at least it should, I never tried it). Ciao ;-) -- Alex DupreReceived on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 13:36:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC