Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ian FREISLICH wrote:

> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> > 
> >   http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> > 
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
> 
> That would be a very a nice thing, but it looks like this breaks
> the patch that I submitted (kern/64240) which fixes the acknowledged
> problem with 'ipfw tee' accepting packets instead of copying them
> to the divert port and then processing the packet according to the
> rest of the rule set.
> 
> There have been about 5 PRs (most with patches) in the past years
> which all claim to fix this problem indicating that here is a need
> for a fix.  We rely on the fix in kern/64240 to collect traffic
> accounting information for billing and statistical purposes.  There
> hasn't been much interest from the committers in having a look at
> this even though the work has already been done.
> 
> Now that you're actively working on that part of the source, would
> it be possible to take a look?  I would also be happy to create a
> new patch to fix this problem against ipfw with pfilhooks if that's
> what it's going to take to get a fix committed.
> 
> Ian
> 
> --
> Ian Freislich

hmmm I guess the pathc should be pointed out to luigi or an ipfw
person..
it's probably not that you're being ignored it's probably that no-one
who has his fingers in ipfw noticed it..

julian
Received on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 22:20:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:58 UTC