To some extent it can be said that Poul-Henning's proceedure worked.. It must be admitted that: "supported" -> "HEADSUP" -> objections -> "supported" is a legitimate and correct outcome, and certainly one of the reasons that we do the "HEADSUP" part in the first place :-) On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <40DF2607.5020409_at_mac.com> > Chuck Swiger <cswiger_at_mac.com> writes: > : In other words, I care quite a bit about how "working, supported > : functionality" gets transitioned to "no longer available". I'm not happy with > : the notion of "supported" -> "HEADS UP" -> one week -> gone. > > It appears that this is widely used enough that it won't be removed. > I agree that this is a too streamlined path. > > Warner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Mon Jun 28 2004 - 15:45:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC