On Wednesday 30 June 2004 19:43, Jorge Mario G. wrote: > Hi there > well > I dont know if pflogd requires the user/groupe to be > _pflogd. But if not why the _ ??? > from "our" point of view is ugly and "adds" > complication. aslo the standard of freebsd is normal > understandable usernames. The discussion about this took place on -current before I did the commit. "_" is a legal character in an user/groupname. Many people also stated that they prefer "_<service>" as it makes things clear. I personally have no strong opinion one way or the other, but it's noteable less work (for me) when the username is the same as in OpenBSD. I don't see how "_pflogd" is less understandable than "pflogd" and neither do I see any complication. -- Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:59 UTC