Re: NULL vs 0 vs 0L bikeshed time

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:31:01 -0700 (MST)
In message: <200403011315.i21DFvC95798_at_lakes.dignus.com>
            Thomas David Rivers <rivers_at_dignus.com> writes:
:  But - I believe (and I need to check on this) that the C++
:  standard requires the NULL constant to be a pointer type (so
:  various conversions work.)

C++ needs it to be a 0, not a pointer.

Warner
Received on Mon Mar 01 2004 - 21:31:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:45 UTC