On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:10:29PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > >- if (!__isthreaded) > >- PANIC("Spinlock called when not threaded."); > > if (!initialized) > > PANIC("Spinlocks not initialized."); > > /* > > > > > As I saw some reports in the -CURRENT list, the panic is always > triggered by mix up > of libc_r and libpthread in same program. So to avoid other mysterious > crashes, > I'd like keep the code there, it is now used to check the problem. Would it be a good idea to change the wording of this error message to give the user a better idea of how to fix the problem? PANIC("Spinlock called when not threaded.\nPossible problem: program might be linked to both -lpthread and -lc_r, instead of linking only one of them.\n"); Or, something to that effect. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc_at_crodrigues.orgReceived on Wed Mar 03 2004 - 08:32:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:45 UTC