Re: Who wants SACK? (Re: was My planned work on networking stack)

From: Brooks Davis <brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:22:56 -0800
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> 
> >For that matter, there are sufficent drops on 10GbE from data errors to
> >insure that two boxes connected back to back won't achieve line speed on
> >a single TCP session.
> >
> Do you have data to back this up or are you just using broadcom chipsets?

I looked for the paper I paraphrased, I'm pretty sure if was one by
Sally Floyd.  I didn't find it, but this paper talks a bit about the
issue on page 7:

http://www.calit2.net/research/labs/features/CACM/CACMDefanti.pdf

The problem is that the BER of a typical optical link is high enough
that the link will almost certantly discard at least one packet before
you get out of slow-start and once that happens it, AIMK means it take
hours or even days to get back up to the top even assuming you don't
lose further packets.  This isn't a problem for most people, but it's
definalty a problem for the HPC community.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 10:23:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:46 UTC