At 09:46 16/03/2004, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > usr.sbin/nslookup should be part of freebsd-base-bind, not > freebsd-base, just like dig, host and dnsquery (there's probably > more). I thought about those for quite a while. I ended up deciding that while they are technically part of bind, the most likely reason why someone would want to remove bind is if they are replacing the *name server* with something else (eg, djbdns), and they would probably be surprised if {nslookup, dig, host, dnsquery} disappeared. The best solution might be to tag those four as freebsd-base-bind-client... as I said, this was a one-day hack job with all sorts of rough edges. If you want to count those as part of freebsd-base-bind, just remove the COMPONENT= lines from their respective Makefiles; they'll inherit the -bind tag from usr.sbin/named/Makefile.inc. > isn't the freebsd- prefix enough? I mean, from the names I would > expect freebsd-base be a superset of all the freebsd-base-*. Well, the ports tree already has "freebsd-games", "freebsd-uucp", and "freebsd-update"; it might be confusing if the -base- were omitted. Better to err on the side of verbosity. Colin PercivalReceived on Tue Mar 16 2004 - 00:59:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:47 UTC