Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like SCHED_4BSD)

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch
> to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message)

Do people think we should commit this?
 
> --- sched_ule.c.orig	Fri Feb 13 05:24:48 2004
> +++ sched_ule.c	Fri Feb 13 05:37:53 2004
> _at__at_ -186,7 +186,7 _at__at_
>  #define	SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg)						\
>      (sched_interact_score(kg) < SCHED_INTERACT_THRESH)
>  #define	SCHED_CURR(kg, ke)						\
> -    (ke->ke_thread->td_priority != kg->kg_user_pri ||			\
> +    (ke->ke_thread->td_priority < kg->kg_user_pri ||			\
>      SCHED_INTERACTIVE(kg))
>  
>  /*
> _at__at_ -1166,11 +1166,8 _at__at_
>  	 */
>  	if ((ke->ke_flags & KEF_ASSIGNED) == 0) {
>  		if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td)) {
> -			if (td->td_proc->p_flag & P_SA) {
> -				kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> -				setrunqueue(td);
> -			} else 
> -				kseq_runq_add(KSEQ_SELF(), ke);
> +			kseq_load_rem(KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu), ke);
> +			setrunqueue(td);