On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 05:06:08PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:58:07PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > Idea that library must match headers used is pretty natural. > > Just yet one note: the ports which expects _binary_ compatibility between > our headers and some 3rd party library (as GNU one) are broken initially. > Even it was so at some moment, later each library can evolve by its own > path, so nothing guaranteed here. The exact example of this situation is the whole case we discuss. I not remove NO_POSIX_COMPAT ifndef from GNU sources - they did it by themself. Should we revert their decision and make it looks like old one? Should we do it in all future cases? I think - not. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Sat Mar 20 2004 - 08:18:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC