I don't think that fuctionality you need is much dependent whether it's ports or whether it's base. I vote for ports just because we have some platforms that is unsupported by doscmd. Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger_at_sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger_at_fpm.ami.nstu.ru On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: >On Monday 15 March 2004 18:55, Bruce M Simpson wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:53:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: >> > Mark Linimon <linimon_at_lonesome.com> writes: >> > > So, you'll be submitting the patches to install it to the ports >> > > tree, then? >> > >> > Yes. >> >> Excellent. I use doscmd for certain things such as running flash and >> BIOS related tools. I'd be happy to see it 'bumped down' to ports status. >> > >I think doscmd works very well, I've been playing with it a couple of >days, and its great. > >The pity is that it doesn't have support for int13, which is used by >most of the old MS_DOS games (like Prince of Persia, my favourite). > >If it's going to be well mantained, I would prefer to see it on the ports >collection, but on the other hand I wouldn't like to see >this program dissapear from FreeBSD at all. > >I've never tested it with flash utilities and such (Im afraid of upgrading >my flash :), but I think it is a useful thing to have, either on the base >system or in the ports. > >Regards. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Sun Mar 21 2004 - 18:00:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC