On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:09:46 -0800 (PST) Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:33:36 -0800 (PST) > > Nate Lawson <nate_at_root.org> wrote: > > > > The change must have happen between 2004_03_04 and 2004_03_18. > > > > > > I don't think it was the _PRS changes on 3/18 and 3/20. I'm suspecting > > > the ACPI-CA import of 0311. You can revert all changes to acpi_pcib.c by > > > copying this file over sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib.c and recompiling your > > > kernel: > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pcib.c?rev=1.36&content-type=text/plain > > > > > > I suspect it won't change anything for you but please test this to be > > > sure. > > > > I'm doing it right now, thank you. > > (Recompiling the acpi.ko wouldn't be enough ?) > > Yes, recompiling just the acpi kernel module would be fine. Well, the kernel is almost ready now. > > > Your ASL returns a different interrupt link resource based on an external > > > variable DEID. It may be thinking it's in PIC mode and returning the IRQ > > > resource instead of APIC mode and the Interrupt resource. See the section > > > for ALKC to see what I'm talking about. > > > > Where do I find this section ? > > Device (ALKC) in your ASL. Aha. > One other thing you might try if reverting acpi_pcib.c doesn't help is to > set hw.acpi.serialize_method=0 at the loader prompt. If that doesn't > work, set hw.acpi.osi_name=0 at the prompt. Then try both. OK, I'll try this too, and mail after. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD userReceived on Mon Mar 22 2004 - 11:16:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC