On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:36:35PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > TLS is "kernel invisible" (other than what we have already done to make > > %gs point where we need it.) ((or the equivalent in other > > architectures) > > so there is no kernel work.. > > Uh, who is going to investigate the situation on the other platforms and > make any needed changes? Lack of that is also a deal breaker. I won't > participate in TLS if it is going to be yet another feature that makes > our platforms not on equal footing. > _______________________________________________ The only feature that wil put them on an unequal footing is if the toolchain support for one of them is incomplete, or we can not alter the run-time linker for one of them.. We designed the ABI for each to take TLS into account. > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Wed Mar 24 2004 - 11:53:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC