On 3/24/2004 1:09 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 23 March 2004 06:01 pm, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >>Now I'm going to get some sleep.. as here is midnight.. >> >>Hope this short session from gdb will give you some more >>information for solving this problem.. please ask me any >>relevant information you may need to look into this problem. >> >>Thank you. >> >> >>*********************************************************** >>web.dti.supsi.ch# gdb -k kernel.debug /usr/crash/vmcore.1 >>GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) >>Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you >>are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain >>conditions. >>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. >>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. >>This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... >>panic: page fault >>panic messages: >>--- >>Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >>cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 >>fault virtual address = 0xff70ff70 >>fault code = supervisor read, page not present >>instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0568949 >>stack pointer = 0x10:0xe40a1b04 >>frame pointer = 0x10:0xe40a1b28 >>code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b >> = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >>processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >>current process = 303 (ifconfig) >>trap number = 12 >>panic: page fault >>cpuid = 0; >>boot() called on cpu#0 >> >>syncing disks, buffers remaining... 218 218 216 216 215 215 215 215 215 >>215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 215 >>giving up on 200 buffers >>Uptime: 46s >>Dumping 1023 MB >> 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224 240 256 272 288 304 >>320 336 352 368 384 400 416 432 448 464 480 496 512 528 544 560 576 592 >>608 624 640 656 672 688 704 720 736 752 768 784 800 816 832 848 864 880 >>896 912 928 944 960 976 992 1008 >>--- >>Reading symbols from >>/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi.ko.debug...d >>one. Loaded symbols for >>/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi.ko.debug >>#0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:240 >>240 dumping++; >>(kgdb) list *0xc0568949 >>0xc0568949 is in rt_msg2 (/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:708). >>703 register struct sockaddr *sa; >>704 >>705 if ((sa = rtinfo->rti_info[i]) == 0) >>706 continue; >>707 rtinfo->rti_addrs |= (1 << i); >>708 dlen = ROUNDUP(sa->sa_len); >>709 if (cp) { >>710 bcopy((caddr_t)sa, cp, (unsigned)dlen); >>711 cp += dlen; >>712 } > > Ok, your panic is because the sa pointer is bogus. I think sa_len is the > first item in sockaddr, so that means sa = 0xff07ff07, which is a weird > value, certainly not a valid kernel pointer. This code is in the routing > table, so the best place to ask about this is on the net_at_ list probably. > I've also cc'd a couple of folks who might be able to help. Andre has done a > lot of work recently on the routing table I believe. How recently? This was after a 5.2-p1 -> RELENG_5_2 upgrade (for you late comers). JonReceived on Wed Mar 24 2004 - 11:57:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:48 UTC