On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Robert Watson <rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > > I'd be very interested in knowing if changing your application to bind > > alternative IP addresses rather than using jail to force the binding to an > > alternative address changes the performance results. I.e., are we looking > > at a problem with additional aliases and not a problem with jail at all... > > I reproduced the problem with scp, then threw in -oBindAddress=foo. It > seems you're on to something; running it outside any jail but bound to > one of the aliases gave the same symptoms as running it from inside a > jail. Are your aliases configured on lo0, or on the ethernet interface? Could we see some excerpted ifconfig output for your interface (perhaps only ten -- first five, last five of the 2000+ IP addresses :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert_at_fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee ResearchReceived on Tue Mar 30 2004 - 15:29:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC