Re: spin lock sleepq chain held by 0xc0fc3540 for > 5 seconds

From: Ian FREISLICH <if_at_hetzner.co.za>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 17:28:59 +0200
> That might not be enough information to go on.  Prefereably when something 
> like this happens, and a core dump is not going to happen, "show locks",
> "ps", and "tr" of interesting processes, from DDB, would be the most useful 
> things to have.

I'll get these the next time it does this.  The kernel is compile
without DDB, so I hope it's not a heisenbug.

Ian

--
Ian Freislich
Received on Fri May 07 2004 - 06:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:53 UTC