Re: spin lock sleepq chain held by 0xc0fc3540 for > 5 seconds

From: Ian FREISLICH <if_at_hetzner.co.za>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 11:05:31 +0200
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> That might not be enough information to go on.  Prefereably when something 
> like this happens, and a core dump is not going to happen, "show locks",
> "ps", and "tr" of interesting processes, from DDB, would be the most useful 
> things to have.

The debugger is not available because the system is wedged solid
so these usefull data are unobtainable :(

Ian

--
Ian Freislich
Received on Sat May 08 2004 - 00:05:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:53 UTC