Re: Unified getcwd() implementation

From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz_at_stack.nl>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 04:51:55 +0200
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:03:12AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> > standards/44425 mentions why the current implementation is not a bug in
> > the standards point of view.
> > 
> > bin/22291, kern/30527, kern/39331 and kern/55993 are about issues we
> > have because of the current implementation.
> 
> 30527 seems to be unrelated...

Erhm, sorry, that should've been 39527...

Marc
Received on Sat May 08 2004 - 17:52:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:53 UTC