On Sat, 15 May 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:25:16PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > +> +> in fact experimentation in -current shows this to be correct.. > +> +> in a jail: > +> +> > +> +> xxx# chflags noschg libthr.so.1 > +> +> xxx# ls -lo libthr.so.1 > +> +> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 611568 May 15 00:02 libthr.so.1 > +> +> xxx# chflags schg libthr.so.1 > +> +> xxx# ls -lo libthr.so.1 > +> +> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel schg 611568 May 15 00:02 libthr.so.1 > +> +> xxx# > +> +> > +> +> comments? yeahs? neys? > +> > +> Whoa! This looks very serious. > > Ok, false alarm:) After discussion with rwatson_at_ and cperciva_at_, it looks > that changing those flags is permitted due to per-jail securelevels, > which were intruduced in 5.x. so, should I add the sysctl? > > -- > Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org > pjd_at_FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl > FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! >Received on Sat May 15 2004 - 14:00:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC