Re: bind timeouts

From: Randy Bush <randy_at_psg.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:10:58 -0700

>> no.  it means an MX referring to a CNAME which resolves to an A
> Not by my reading.

then maybe try reading rfc 2181 sec 10.3

randy

Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 06:11:02 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Network performance, netperf patches and more."
Previous message: Matthew D. Fuller: "Re: bind timeouts"
Maybe in reply to: Cyrille Lefevre: "bind timeouts"
Next in thread: Don Lewis: "Re: bind timeouts"
Reply: Don Lewis: "Re: bind timeouts"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC