On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: ... > > The most common use of that table is to have an l3_addr and search the > > ll_addr, right? In that case making ll_addr variable shouldn't have a > > measurable influence on speed. Variable l3_addr could be different though. > > Well it seems to me that IPv6 neighbour discovery is different enough > from ARP that it makes sense to have IPv4-specialised ARP and actually, not too much -- the patch i used already included nd6 code that borrowed a lot from the v4 version. anyways, as i said, i need to think a bit about things before making a decision. cheers luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 13:39:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC