On 05/19/04 22:34, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Here is a top's snapshot from a dual CPU machine. Two lame encoders > compete for the first CPU, while the total idle time is 35.6%. Why is > that? Because they are nice? Is niceness really supposed to allow for > wasted CPU? Thanks! I noticed the cdparanoi[a] processes. What is/are the exact command(s) you are doing? If you are encoding on-the-fly, are you sure the lame processes are not being limited by the ripping rate? It would be best if you could come up with a test case for us to see if we can reproduce your problem. Jon NoackReceived on Thu May 20 2004 - 17:24:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC