On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:24:11 +0200, Thomas Moestl <t.moestl_at_tu-bs.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 2004/05/18 at 12:57:34 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > to answer question 2... > > nothing.. in my sources I renamed it to cpu_exit2() > > The name probably derives from the fact that it needs to be called > after the sched lock is obtained, as was mentioned in the commit > message. Maybe call it: cpu_exit_postsched() :-)Received on Thu May 20 2004 - 10:38:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:54 UTC