Re: SCHED_BSD vs SCHED_ULE ...

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 18:12:13 -0700
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:41:53PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> Is there a circumstance where the older SCHED is better then ULE?
> 
> Or is the older one something that will eventually just be removed 
> altogether?
> 
> If the older does have areas in which it is the better, are there any docs 
> comparing the two?

ULE has some bugs still, and the maintainer has been busy with
!FreeBSD for a while now.

Specifically, ULE doesn't work well on HTT (poor performance, and the
sysctls to disable HTT don't work), and I have interactivity problems
with it on my amd64 desktop.

Kris

Received on Sat May 29 2004 - 16:12:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:55 UTC