> > On Sat, 29 May 2004, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > > > I remember it has been discussed before, but the terms were a little bit > > different, so tell me, isn't it appropriate rc.subr to suck the > > configuration parameters from /usr/local/etc/rc.conf instead of > > /etc/rc.conf when running startupscripts for third party applications > > (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/)? > > > > To keep the organization principles, I dislike putting those > > instructions into /etc/rc.conf when it should be read by 3rd party apps, > > since I consider /etc/ to be used by the base system. Altho' old style > > .sh scripts are still usefull under ${local_startup} dirs, ports > > maintainers tend to write new style rc scripts that uses rc.subr to read > > the user defined options (usually via /etc/rc.conf). > > > > Easy solution would be > > > > rc_conf_files="/etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf.local /usr/local/etc/rc.conf" > > > > into /etc/rc.conf, but it seems to be ignored by rc.subr when it's not > > at /etc/defaults/rc.conf; > > > > Some 3rd party startupscripts read rc.subr from /usr/local/etc/, so if > > it suck only ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.conf options, would force users to > > configure it in the right place, but it would break POLA and since some > > scripts read /etc/rc.subr instead if ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.subr, would also > > break some ports (very very bad idea). > > > > So, to allow ports startupscript to be configured from > > /usr/local/etc/rc.conf but also prevent people who are today used to mix > > everything in /etc/rc.conf from having their app. not starting, defining > > > > rc_conf_files="/etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf.local /usr/local/etc/rc.conf" > > > > into /etc/defaults/rc.conf would just do it, nothing would break and > > port's pkg-message could start trying to educate users to populate > > /usr/local/etc/rc.conf for ports startup options and leaving > > /etc/rc.conf only for the base system... > > Having multiple locations for system startup parameters (A là Windows) is > a maintenance headache even when there's a logical method to the > madness. I'm saying this as the admin of 6 racks packed with 1U and 2U > machines. Be gentle... ;) > and some of us (i hope more than one), have /usr/local shared among many. dannyReceived on Sun May 30 2004 - 03:03:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:55 UTC