On Nov 2, 2004, at 6:48 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:36:17PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 November 2004 16:20, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> (there are at least 350 ports that emit warnings about aliasing, and >>> would >>> probably have runtime errors when compiled with -O2; moreover, a >>> number of >>> ports fail to even build with -O2). >> >> Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in Gentoo's >> "portage" system? Those guys love to build with -O310 >> -fomit-instructions >> but their stuff seems to pretty much work. Why do we seem to have so >> many >> problems with (presumably?) the same software on our system? > > Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that > don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet > optimization. Some ports from portage ie http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/media-libs/gst- plugins/gst-plugins-0.8.5-r1.ebuild gst-plugins use replace-flags which is for example ... ${CFLAGS:S/-O2/-O} or filter-flags which removes flags that cause a known build failure. Michael > KrisReceived on Tue Nov 02 2004 - 22:55:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:20 UTC